<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8216;Onkel Barack&#8217;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thenewmediadiva.com/2008/06/12/onkel-barack/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thenewmediadiva.com/2008/06/12/onkel-barack/</link>
	<description>Rashunda Tramble on...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 02:05:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wolf</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewmediadiva.com/2008/06/12/onkel-barack/comment-page-1/#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Wolf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 16:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewmediadiva.com/?p=95#comment-130</guid>
		<description>The intention of the title is not clear and remains inexplicable. Similarly therefore, the question of an apology is not at all clear just by considering the title. Is it a warm hearted &quot;bad taste&quot; joke? Is it s cold blooded attention getter to boost dwindling print news sales? 

Clearly, people got upset and so that much is apparent - and that is what the authors could have prevented. And that is why they should consider to clarify the basis of why at all that they think that was funny and they must apologize. 

There was another instance where apparent ambiguities and awkward alliterations are the source of considerable chagrin and thus should be avoided for greater audiences:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_about_the_word_%22niggardly%22</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The intention of the title is not clear and remains inexplicable. Similarly therefore, the question of an apology is not at all clear just by considering the title. Is it a warm hearted &#8220;bad taste&#8221; joke? Is it s cold blooded attention getter to boost dwindling print news sales? </p>
<p>Clearly, people got upset and so that much is apparent &#8211; and that is what the authors could have prevented. And that is why they should consider to clarify the basis of why at all that they think that was funny and they must apologize. </p>
<p>There was another instance where apparent ambiguities and awkward alliterations are the source of considerable chagrin and thus should be avoided for greater audiences:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_about_the_word_%22niggardly%22" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Controversies_about_the_word_%22niggardly%22</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TNMD: &#8216;Onkel Barack&#8217;? &#60; rashundatramble.com</title>
		<link>http://www.thenewmediadiva.com/2008/06/12/onkel-barack/comment-page-1/#comment-129</link>
		<dc:creator>TNMD: &#8216;Onkel Barack&#8217;? &#60; rashundatramble.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 11:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thenewmediadiva.com/?p=95#comment-129</guid>
		<description>[...] New post over at TNMD: Onkel Barack. Please comment over there. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] New post over at TNMD: Onkel Barack. Please comment over there. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
